skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Blueprints: Systematizing Behavior Change Designs—The Case of Social Comparison Theory

Published: 29 November 2023 Publication History

Abstract

To improve people’s lives, human-computer interaction researchers are increasingly designing technological solutions based on behavior change theory, such as social comparison theory (SCT). However, how researchers operationalize such a theory as a design remains largely unclear. One way to clarify this methodological step is to clearly state which functional elements of a design are aimed at operationalizing a specific behavior change theory construct to evaluate if such aims were successful. In this article, we investigate how the operationalization of functional elements of theories and designs can be more easily conveyed. First, we present a scoping review of the literature to determine the state of operationalizations of SCT as behavior change designs. Second, we introduce a new tool to facilitate the operationalization process. We term the tool blueprints. A blueprint explicates essential functional elements of a behavior change theory by describing it in relation to necessary and sufficient building blocks incorporated in a design. We describe the process of developing a blueprint for SCT. Last, we illustrate how the blueprint can be used during the design refinement and reflection process.

References

[1]
Gabriel Abend. 2008. The meaning of ‘theory.’ Sociological Theory 26, 2 (2008), 173–199.
[2]
Christopher Alexander, Sara Ishikawa, Murray Silverstein, Max Jacobson, Ingrid Fiksdah-King, and Shlomo Angel. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press.
[3]
Danielle Arigo, Megan M. Brown, Kristen Pasko, and Jerry Suls. 2020. Social comparison features in physical activity promotion apps: Scoping meta-review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22, 3 (2020), e15642.
[4]
Danielle Arigo, Jacqueline A. Mogle, Megan M. Brown, Kristen Pasko, Laura Travers, Logan Sweeder, and Joshua M. Smyth. 2020. Methods to assess social comparison processes within persons in daily life: A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2020), 2909.
[5]
Danielle Arigo and Jerry M. Suls. 2018. Smartphone apps providing social comparison for health behavior change: A need for better tailoring to person and context. Mhealth 4 (2018), 46.
[6]
L. Kay Bartholomew and Patricia Dolan Mullen. 2011. Five roles for using theory and evidence in the design and testing of behavior change interventions. Journal of Public Health Dentistry 71 (2011), S20–S33.
[7]
Scott Bateman, Regan L. Mandryk, Carl Gutwin, Aaron Genest, David McDine, and Christopher Brooks. 2010. Useful junk? The effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2573–2582.
[8]
Jordan Beck and Hamid R. Ekbia. 2018. The theory-practice gap as generative metaphor. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.
[9]
Benjamin B. Bederson and Ben Shneiderman (Eds.). 2003. The Craft of Information Visualization: Readings and Reflections. Morgan Kaufmann.
[10]
Jan O. Borchers. 2008. A pattern approach to interaction design. In Cognition, Communication and Interaction. Springer, 114–131.
[11]
Marc Busch, Johann Schrammel, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2013. Personalized persuasive technology—Development and validation of scales for measuring persuadability. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Persuasive Technology. 33–38.
[12]
Abraham P. Buunk and Frederick X. Gibbons. 2007. Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102, 1 (2007), 3–21.
[13]
Philip J. Cash. 2018. Developing theory-driven design research. Design Studies 56 (2018), 84–119.
[14]
Philip J. Cash, Charlotte Gram Hartlev, and Christine Boysen Durazo. 2017. Behavioural design: A process for integrating behaviour change and design. Design Studies 48 (2017), 96–128.
[15]
C. K. Bernard Choi and A. W. Anita Pak. 2006. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine 29, 6 (2006), 351–364.
[16]
Heather Cole-Lewis and Trace Kershaw. 2010. Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management. Epidemiologic Reviews 32, 1 (April 2010), 56–69.
[17]
Lucas Colusso, Cynthia L. Bennett, Gary Hsieh, and Sean A. Munson. 2017. Translational resources: Reducing the gap between academic research and HCI practice. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 957–968.
[18]
Lucas Colusso, Tien Do, and Gary Hsieh. 2018. Behavior change design sprints. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 791–803.
[19]
Lucas Colusso, Gary Hsieh, and Sean A. Munson. 2016. Designing closeness to increase gamers’ performance. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3020–3024.
[20]
Lucas Colusso, Ridley Jones, Sean A. Munson, and Gary Hsieh. 2019. A translational science model for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[21]
Katja Corcoran, Gayannee Kedia, Rifeta Illemann, and Helga Innerhofer. 2020. Affective consequences of social comparisons by women with breast cancer: An experiment. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020). 1234.
[22]
Peter Dalsgaard and Christian Dindler. 2014. Between theory and practice: Bridging concepts in HCI research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1635–1644.
[23]
Rachel Davis, Rona Campbell, Zoe Hildon, Lorna Hobbs, and Susan Michie. 2015. Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: A scoping review. Health Psychology Review 9, 3 (2015), 323–344.
[24]
Andy Dearden and Janet Finlay. 2006. Pattern languages in HCI: A critical review. Human–Computer Interaction 21, 1 (2006), 49–102.
[25]
Blake M. DiCosola III and Gina Neff. 2020. Using social comparisons to facilitate healthier choices in online grocery shopping contexts. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.
[26]
Paul Dourish. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 541–550.
[27]
Steven Dow, T. Scott Saponas, Yang Li, and James A. Landay. 2006. External representations in ubiquitous computing design and the implications for design tools. InProceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’06). ACM, New York, NY, 241–250.
[28]
Thomas Erickson, Ming Li, Younghun Kim, Ajay Deshpande, Sambit Sahu, Tian Chao, Piyawadee Sukaviriya, and Milind Naphade. 2013. The Dubuque Electricity Portal: Evaluation of a city-scale residential electricity consumption feedback system. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1203–1212.
[29]
Thomas Erickson, Mark Podlaseck, Sambit Sahu, Jing D. Dai, Tian Chao, and Milind Naphade. 2012. The Dubuque Water Portal: Evaluation of the uptake, use and impact of residential water consumption feedback. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 675–684.
[30]
Daniel Fallman. 2003. Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 225–232.
[31]
Leon Festinger. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7, 2 (1954), 117–140.
[32]
Ken Friedman. 2003. Theory construction in design research: Criteria: Approaches, and methods. Design Studies 24, 6 (2003), 507–522.
[33]
Bill Gaver and John Bowers. 2012. Annotated portfolios. Interactions 19, 4 (2012), 40–49.
[34]
William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 937–946.
[35]
J. P. Gerber. 2020. Social comparison theory. In Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, Virgil Zeigler-Hill and Todd K. Shackelford (Eds.). Springer, 5004–5011.
[36]
Frederick X. Gibbons and Bram P. Buunk. 1999. Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76, 1 (1999), 129.
[37]
Daniel T. Gilbert, R. Brian Giesler, and Kathryn A. Morris. 1995. When comparisons arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69, 2 (1995), 227.
[38]
Phillip Gough. 2017. From the analytical to the artistic: A review of literature on information visualization. Leonardo 50, 1 (2017), 47–52.
[39]
Joanna Hale, Janna Hastings, Robert West, Carmen E. Lefevre, Artur Direito, Lauren Connell Bohlen, Cristina Godinho, Niall Anderson, Silje Zink, Hilary Groarke, and Susan Michie. 2020. An ontology-based modelling system (OBMS) for representing behaviour change theories applied to 76 theories. Wellcome Open Research 5 (2020), 177.
[40]
Paul Hekkert and Helmut Leder. 2008. Product aesthetics. Product Experience 2008 (2008), 259–285.
[41]
Eric B. Hekler, Predrag Klasnja, Jon E. Froehlich, and Matthew P. Buman. 2013. Mind the theoretical gap: Interpreting, using, and developing behavioral theory in HCI research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3307–3316.
[42]
Jennifer Hoewe. 2017. Manipulation check. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Wiley, 1–5.
[43]
Kristina Höök, Jeffrey Bardzell, Simon Bowen, Peter Dalsgaard, Stuart Reeves, and Annika Waern. 2015. Framing IxD knowledge. Interactions 22, 6 (2015), 32–36.
[44]
Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19, 3 (2012), 1–18.
[45]
Stephanie Houde and Charles Hill. 1997. What do prototypes prototype? In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier, 367–381.
[46]
Bernd Huber, Katharina Reinecke, and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. 2017. The effect of performance feedback on social media sharing at volunteer-based online experiment platforms. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1882–1886.
[47]
Predrag Klasnja, Sunny Consolvo, and Wanda Pratt. 2011. How to evaluate technologies for health behavior change in HCI research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3063–3072.
[48]
Tuomas Lehto and Harri Oinas-Kukkonen. 2011. Persuasive features in web-based alcohol and smoking interventions: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13, 3 (2011), e1559.
[49]
Mailin Lemke and Roelof A. J. de Vries. 2021. Operationalizing behavior change theory as part of persuasive technology: A scoping review on social comparison. Frontiers in Computer Science 3 (2021), 1–6.
[50]
Gilly Leshed, Dan Cosley, Jeffrey T. Hancock, and Geri Gay. 2010. Visualizing language use in team conversations: Designing through theory, experiments, and iterations. In CHI’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4567–4582.
[51]
Youn-Kyung Lim, Erik Stolterman, and Josh Tenenberg. 2008. The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 15, 2 (2008), 1–27.
[52]
Jonas Löwgren. 2013. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge. Interactions 20, 1 (2013), 30–34.
[53]
Danwei Tran Luciani, Martin Lindvall, and Jonas Löwgren. 2018. Machine learning as a design material: A curated collection of exemplars for visual interaction. In Proceedings of NordDesign 2018 (DS ’91).
[54]
Susan Michie and Marie Johnston. 2012. Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change. Health Psychology Review 6, 1 (2012), 1–6.
[55]
Susan Michie, Marie Johnston, Jill Francis, Wendy Hardeman, and Martin Eccles. 2008. From theory to intervention: Mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Applied Psychology 57, 4 (2008), 660–680.
[56]
Susan Michie, Michelle Richardson, Marie Johnston, Charles Abraham, Jill Francis, Wendy Hardeman, Martin P. Eccles, James Cane, and Caroline E. Wood. 2013. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 46, 1 (2013), 81–95.
[57]
Andrew Vande Moere and Helen Purchase. 2011. On the role of design in information visualization. Information Visualization 10, 4 (2011), 356–371.
[58]
Zachary Munn, Micah D. J. Peters, Cindy Stern, Catalin Tufanaru, Alexa McArthur, and Edoardo Aromataris. 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology 18, 1 (2018), 1–7.
[59]
Kristina Niedderer, Stephen Clune, and Geke Ludden. 2017. Design for Behaviour Change: Theories and Practices of Designing for Change. Routledge.
[60]
Donald A. Norman. 2010. The research-practice gap: The need for translational developers. Interactions 17, 4 (2010), 9–12.
[61]
Jane Ogden. 2003. Some problems with social cognition models: A pragmatic and conceptual analysis. Health Psychology 22, 4 (2003), 424.
[62]
Harri Oinas-Kukkonen and Marja Harjumaa. 2009. Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24, 1 (2009), 28.
[63]
Rita Orji. 2017. Why are persuasive strategies effective? Exploring the strengths and weaknesses of socially-oriented persuasive strategies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Persuasive Technology. 253–266.
[64]
Rita Orji and Karyn Moffatt. 2018. Persuasive technology for health and wellness: State-of-the-art and emerging trends. Health Informatics Journal 24, 1 (2018), 66–91.
[65]
Rita Orji, Lennart E. Nacke, and Chrysanne Di Marco. 2017. Towards personality-driven persuasive health games and gamified systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1015–1027.
[66]
Antti Oulasvirta and Kasper Hornbæk. 2022. Counterfactual thinking: What theories do in design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 38, 1 (2022), 78–92.
[67]
Alicia O’Cathain, Liz Croot, Katie Sworn, Edward Duncan, Nikki Rousseau, Katrina Turner, Lucy Yardley, and Pat Hoddinott. 2019. Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: A systematic methods overview. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 5, 1 (2019), 1–27.
[68]
Marianne Graves Petersen, Ole Sejer Iversen, Peter Gall Krogh, and Martin Ludvigsen. 2004. Aesthetic interaction: A pragmatist’s aesthetics of interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. 269–276.
[69]
Petromil Petkov, Felix Köbler, Marcus Foth, Richard Medland, and Helmut Krcmar. 2011. Engaging energy saving through motivation-specific social comparison. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1945–1950.
[70]
James O. Prochaska, Carlo C. DiClemente, and John C. Norcross. 1997. In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.American Psychologist 47, 9 (1997), 1102–1114.
[71]
Jonas Rehn and Kai Schuster. 2017. Clinic design as placebo-using design to promote healing and support treatments. Behavioral Sciences 7, 4 (2017), 77.
[72]
Yvonne Rogers. 2004. New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 38, 1 (2004), 87–143.
[73]
Corina Sas, Steve Whittaker, Steven Dow, Jodi Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2014. Generating implications for design through design research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1971–1980.
[74]
Kim Sauvé, Saskia Bakker, and Steven Houben. 2020. Econundrum: Visualizing the climate impact of dietary choice through a shared data sculpture. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1287–1300.
[75]
Erik Stolterman. 2008. The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design 2, 1 (2008), 55–65.
[76]
Erik Stolterman and Mikael Wiberg. 2010. Concept-driven interaction design research. Human–Computer Interaction 25, 2 (2010), 95–118.
[77]
Jerry Suls, Rene Martin, and Ladd Wheeler. 2002. Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science 11, 5 (2002), 159–163.
[78]
Kristian Torning and Harri Oinas-Kukkonen. 2009. Persuasive system design: State of the art and future directions. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. 1–8.
[79]
Andrea C. Tricco, Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin, Kelly K. O’Brien, Heather Colquhoun, Danielle Levac, David Moher, Micah D. J. Peters, Tanya Horsley, Laura Weeks, Susan Hempel, Elie A. Akl, Christine Chang, Jessie McGowan, Lesley Stewart, Lisa Hartling, Adrian Aldcroft, Michael G. Wilson, Chantelle Garritty, Simon Lewin, Christina M. Godfrey, Marilyn T. Macdonald, Etienne V. Langlois, Karla Soares-Weiswer, Jo Moriarty, Tammy Clifford, Ozge Tuncalp, and Sharon E. Straus. 2018. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine 169, 7 (2018), 467–473.
[80]
Nynke Tromp, Paul Hekkert, and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2011. Design for socially responsible behavior: A classification of influence based on intended user experience. Design Issues 27, 3 (2011), 3–19.
[81]
Selen Türkay, Daniel Seaton, and Andrew M Ang. 2018. Itero: A revision history analytics tool for exploring writing behavior and reflection. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.
[82]
Nina Valkanova, Sergi Jorda, Martin Tomitsch, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2013. Reveal-it! The impact of a social visualization projection on public awareness and discourse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3461–3470.
[83]
Thomas van Arkel and Nynke Tromp. 2022. Designing appropriate things: An experiential perspective on the effectiveness of artefacts in contributing to behaviour change. In DRS2022: Bilbao, D. Lockton, S. Lenzi, P. Hekkert, A. Oak, J. Sadaba, and P. Lloyd (Eds.). Design Research Society, 1–19.
[84]
Martijn Van Welie, Gerrit C. Van Der Veer, and Anton Eliëns. 2000. Patterns as tools for user interface design. In Tools for Working with Guidelines. Springer, 313–324.
[85]
Raphael Velt, Steve Benford, and Stuart Reeves. 2017. A survey of the trajectories conceptual framework: Investigating theory use in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2091–2105.
[86]
Thomas Webb, Judith Joseph, Lucy Yardley, and Susan Michie. 2010. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. Journal of Medical Internet Research 12, 1 (2010), e1376.
[87]
Max S. Wenger, Jarad Bell, Peter McEvoy, Cherie Yamaguchi, and Auriana Shokrpour. 2014. Bloom: Fostering healthy and peaceful pregnancies with personal analytics. In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 245–250.
[88]
Mikael Wiberg and Erik Stolterman. 2014. What makes a prototype novel? A knowledge contribution concern for interaction design research. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. 531–540.
[89]
Jichen Zhu, Diane H. Dallal, Robert C. Gray, Jennifer Villareale, Santiago Ontañón, Evan M. Forman, and Danielle Arigo. 2021. Personalization paradox in behavior change apps: Lessons from a social comparison-based personalized app for physical activity. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–21.
[90]
John Zimmerman and Jodi Forlizzi. 2008. The role of design artifacts in design theory construction. Artifact: Journal of Design Practice 2, 1 (2008), 41–45.
[91]
John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 493–502.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Too much social media? Unveiling the effects of determinants in social media fatigueFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2024.127784615Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Self-Determination Theory and HCI Games Research: Unfulfilled Promises and Unquestioned ParadigmsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/3673230Online publication date: 15-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Designing for Autonomy: A Process-Oriented Approach Based on Organismic Integration TheoryInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwae022Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024

Index Terms

  1. Blueprints: Systematizing Behavior Change Designs—The Case of Social Comparison Theory

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
    ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 31, Issue 1
    February 2024
    517 pages
    EISSN:1557-7325
    DOI:10.1145/3613507
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 November 2023
    Online AM: 19 September 2023
    Accepted: 20 June 2023
    Revised: 12 May 2023
    Received: 11 May 2022
    Published in TOCHI Volume 31, Issue 1

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Behavior change theory
    2. social comparison theory
    3. intermediate-level knowledge
    4. scoping review
    5. methods
    6. operationalization
    7. behavior change design
    8. multidisciplinary research

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Pride and Prejudice project funded by the 4TU. Federation in the Netherlands

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1,742
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)219
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Too much social media? Unveiling the effects of determinants in social media fatigueFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2024.127784615Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Self-Determination Theory and HCI Games Research: Unfulfilled Promises and Unquestioned ParadigmsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/3673230Online publication date: 15-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Designing for Autonomy: A Process-Oriented Approach Based on Organismic Integration TheoryInteracting with Computers10.1093/iwc/iwae022Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    Full Text

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media