Talk:Fansite

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fansite article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Websites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Mid-importance).

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 September 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Don't post links to your fansite, please

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kareeser 21:05, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

fanlisting

Should there be some information on Fanlistings?

Maybe. Fanlistings, as stated by TFL, do not have to contain extra content besides the general rules, members, join form, etc. Thus, fanlistings are not exactly fansites in the usual definition. I might add something to it though.--Haley 21:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions For Clean Up

One of the...No THE one thing that bugs me the most is probably the "typical navigation" section, which I find entirely pointless.

Perhaps that merging the few paragraphs about typical content could also be good, along with some rewording/clarification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Puceron (talk • contribs) 01:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fansites! (warning: opinion, pining and original research)

For me, fansites define my early experience with the WWW, especially those with really poorly designed layouts, usually made by teenagers (like myself, back in the day). It's a shame I don't frequent them any more. I'm sure contemporary fansites are still all over the internet, as well as remnants of abandoned websites (with those lovely and awful late-90s/early-00s web designs) and GeoCities (R.I.P.) mirrors. And let's not forget fanlistings! I'm sure I'm not the only person who remembers fanlistings as being nothing more than vanity websites for two groups: 1) for amateur web designers who've just discovered CSS and Adobe Photoshop to flex their new-found web 1.5 skills, and 2) for people to add their contrived web handle to frivolous website listings in order to feel like they are a part of this new cultural phenomenon. I miss those days. - 220.245.253.81 (talk) 13:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, but the talk pages usually are associated with trying to improve the article. 67.160.117.123 (talk) 22:59, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fan Site Kits

Regarding Fan Site Kits, since it goes hand in hand with the Fan Site topic, should we add that too? I can't find any good information that defines Fan Site Kits and what it offers/mainly supply. I think it'd be a good idea to add in; for those who really knows what's it about.
--Koosha136 (talk) 13:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've included below my contribution about Fan Site Kits but do not know which section of the article to include them in.

Admins, please feel free to update the main article where you feel is appropriate:

Fan Site Kits may sometimes be provided by official game and/or anime companies from their websites, with the latter rarely. Most would state their own policy of use of the copyrighted materials provided with the compliance within the set guidelines and permissions. New content may also be added periodically. Some companies may even welcome suggestions for expanding the kits' content.

The kits are usually available in the format of WinZip files, where the media can be extracted for use.

The materials provided would usually range from trademarks and logos to product images and artwork, for example, concept art, box-art, screenshots and avatars, to name a few.

Reference:

http://www.guildwars.com/community/fansites/kit/

http://www.wizards.com/fankit/fantoolkitdnd.html

Koosha136 (talk) 10:29, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fansite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070125215340/http://www.amber-light.co.uk:80/resources/whitepapers/designing_fan_services.pdf to http://www.amber-light.co.uk/resources/whitepapers/designing_fan_services.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:50, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove or improve the History section

It's just a paragraph about their decline which already appears in the lead section of the article Sanack2008 (talk) 15:45, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]