-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Checking whether this pull request makes sense #136
Conversation
Update branch
Update branch
Hi Lucas, |
Did I mess something up... |
I you look at the diff, I made a bunch of changes that are hiding in merges... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
seems ok to me. Please change the one point that I commented. Also, I am not sure wrt the impact of download_chunk_size_in_mb
src/pyglimer/waveform/download.py
Outdated
@@ -813,7 +817,7 @@ def downloadwav( | |||
# # Create handler to the log | |||
if log_fh is None: | |||
fh = logging.FileHandler(os.path.join('logs', 'download.log')) | |||
fh.setLevel(logging.INFO) | |||
fh.setLevel(logging.info) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is not correct. logging.info
is a function, whereas logging.INFO
is the actual logging level.
Codecov Report
❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #136 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 33.74% 33.71% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 37 37
Lines 4839 4855 +16
Branches 863 865 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 1633 1637 +4
- Misses 3112 3124 +12
Partials 94 94
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
looks good. Seems like there is an error with lint (So probably some cosmetic thing). We should probably have a separate action for linting and not run it together with unittest, sorry for that. |
@lsawade Can you check to fix the things that make the unittests fail? If I remember correctly it was only a listing issue. But otherwise I think this is almost mergeable. |
I have made some more mini-updates that I'm going to push and as part of that I'm going to fix the formatting errors. |
…t work if multiple stations are used.
again some linting problems, but after you fixed this, we can merge. |
Hi Peter,
I think I didn't pull something from your branch at some point, and now it's fast-forwarding and rewinding and stuff. There were 0 merge conflicts, but before merging this I/we should go through at least some of the changes, just to see whether they make sense.