Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cue Club 2
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Cue Club#Cue Club 2. ✗plicit 14:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cue Club 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. MouseNJoypad doesn't seem like a reliable source. Suggesting a redirect to Cue Club#Cue Club 2 as an alternative to deletion. I would have redirected without an AfD but there was someone who removed the notability tag. Mika1h (talk) 17:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Cue sports. Mika1h (talk) 17:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Merge Per nom. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:06, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Would like to see the page retained. MouseNJoypad wrote a genuine, independent review of the game shortly after release, even though it is one of the smaller gaming sites. Cue Club 2 is also a regularly updated product, and relevant as PC cue sports simulation. Zanari (talk) 21:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- A single review is generally considered insufficient to pass WP:GNG by even the most lax metric. While single sources can sometimes justify pages, the general consensus for something as small as a review is that at least 3 from clearly reliable sources are needed. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Merge as compromise, per Zxcvbnm. One source isn't usually enough for WP:SIGCOV, but this could be preserved at the Cue Club article, turning it into a series article. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.