User talk:Thehistorianisaac
Daily pageviews of User:Thehistorianisaac
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Thehistorianisaac! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Kleinpecan (talk) 00:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
References required
[edit]Wikipedia requires that references be included at the same time as facts are added. Your edits will continue to be reverted if you do not include references. David notMD (talk) 10:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- But I don't know how to add them Thehistorianisaac (talk) 12:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Read Help:Referencing for beginners, especially RefToolbar sction. Also, I recommend practicing making references in your Sandbox, and only when complete and correct, moving to an article. David notMD (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
I will not contest your reverts of my removals of content, but in the future, if you add content, add references at the same time. Your user-page statement "Hi everyone! I am interested in history and know a lot of this subject, but i have a bad habit that i never add citations(my facts are usually correct but i never remember to add citations)." is not an excuse for not adding references. David notMD (talk) 11:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- I know, but some parts i am only adding stuff that should have been there and is covered late on Thehistorianisaac (talk) 08:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Chlod (say hi!) 16:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks Thehistorianisaac (talk) 16:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue Wizard Digital, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages M24, P90 and SVD. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited July 2009 Ürümqi riots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uyghur.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
- what is this? Thehistorianisaac (talk) 06:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of HMCS Regina (K234)
[edit]The article HMCS Regina (K234) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:HMCS Regina (K234) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Ok i understand now. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 01:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
On a related note, I have reverted your nomination of USS North Carolina (BB-55) for FA. It's pretty bad form to nominate articles for reviews if you haven't edited them previously, or even bothered to discuss it with the people who wrote the articles. If you had, I'd have told you that the sourcing on that article is not what it needs to be for FA. You should really only nominate articles for review if you have edited them significantly, or have at least opened a discussion on the talk page so those who wrote the article can advise you whether the article is ready or not. Parsecboy (talk) 20:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
I don't know why you placed an ad-tag on the article for a 350-year old church, but I removed it. Drmies (talk) 02:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- It was a bit biased at the time i read it, maybe it is now improved. Thanks Thehistorianisaac (talk) 01:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Plant-stub
[edit]Please refrain from applying the Template:Plant-stub
to any articles going forward, as you did on Borrichia arborescens. The plant stub category tree is quite deep, with Borrichia arborescens being a member of Category:Heliantheae stubs, itself a member of Category:Asteroideae stubs, which is a member of Category:Asteraceae stubs which is a member of Category:Asterales stubs, which is a member of Category:Asterid stubs, which is a member of Category:Eudicot stubs, which is a member of Category:Angiosperm stubs which finally arrives at Category:Plant stubs. Please inquire at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants if you need assistance in this matter. Abductive (reasoning) 02:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
February 2023
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from 2023 visit by Joe Biden to Ukraine. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. This issue is currently the topic of ongoing discussions. Please do not remove the notability tag until those conversations are resolved. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- That's not how the template works. See Template:Notability#Removing this tag. Prolog (talk) 22:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
[edit]Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
- What did i nominate? Thehistorianisaac (talk) 09:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 8
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chinese destroyer Nanchang (101), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yu-7.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- done. fixed it Thehistorianisaac (talk) 06:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- RT-2PM Topol
- R-12 Dvina
- added a link pointing to Dvina
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 24
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RT-2PM Topol, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Topol and Poplar.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 31
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- ARA Santa Fe (S-21)
- added a link pointing to Santa Fe
- Brazilian submarine Tonelero (S21)
- added a link pointing to Tonelero
- HMS Farnborough
- added a link pointing to Farnborough
- HMS Raglan
- added a link pointing to Raglan
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited USNS Catawba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catawba.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xi'an Y-20, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kunpeng.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
March 2024 GAN backlog drive
[edit]Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
(t · c) buidhe 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
[edit] Thank you for contributing to the article YJ-12. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 03:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know. Ironically i found that source via another wikipedia article so i thought that website was considered reliable on wikipedia Thehistorianisaac (talk) 03:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)